Café Siller

Psychology and philosophy for ordinary life

Articles Philosophy

People who pick their own lottery ticket won't sell it for the same price

In 1975, a psychologist named Ellen Langer ran a lottery with a twist. Some people chose their own ticket. Others were simply handed one. Then everyone was offered the chance to sell it back.

The people who chose their own ticket asked for more money. The odds were identical. A ticket picked by hand felt luckier than the same ticket handed over, as if choosing it had some say in the draw.

That quiet mistake sits underneath most of our worrying. This article has four ideas, and each one is stranger than the last. By the end, the question "why can't I stop worrying about what I can't change?" should look different.

Your brain treats luck as if it were a skill

Langer called it the illusion of control. When a chance event has features of a skill, like choosing, practising or being involved, people act as if they can steer it. Nothing about the ticket changed. Only the feeling did.

Think of a passenger pressing an imaginary brake pedal while someone else drives. The car doesn't slow down, but the foot feels busy and useful. Much of our late-night worry works like that foot.

Epictetus, a Stoic teacher in the Roman world, spotted the same trap long before Langer. His handbook opens with a split, in Elizabeth Carter's 1758 translation:

Some things are in our control and others not. Things in our control are opinion, pursuit, desire, aversion, and, in a word, whatever are our own actions. Things not in our control are body, property, reputation, command, and, in one word, whatever are not our own actions.

(Epictetus, Enchiridion, section 1, trans. Carter. Source in the list below.)

He isn't saying your body or your reputation don't matter. He's saying you can't fully command them, so any peace that depends on them is on loan.

Now think about what you've been "managing" lately. How much of it is a ticket you picked?

Turning a problem over at 3am feels like effort. It feels like a person working on a solution, even when there is nothing to act on. That is my observation, and the numbers are less kind to it.

Aldao, Nolen-Hoeksema and Schweizer (2010) combined 241 effect sizes from 114 studies on how people cope with feelings. Rumination, which means going over the same problem again and again, had the largest link with symptoms of anxiety, depression, eating problems and substance problems. Of all the strategies measured, the one that feels most like work had the strongest link with trouble.

Think of a rocking chair. It gives you something to do and keeps you moving, but you end the night in the same spot you started. These studies looked at how people usually cope, not at what happens when they change, so they show a pattern and cannot prove cause.

So the next time your mind starts rocking at 3am, ask whether you're travelling or just moving.

The event is not the thing that hurts

Here Epictetus goes a layer deeper. Later in the same handbook he writes that people are disturbed "not by things, but by the principles and notions which they form concerning things" (section 5, Carter).

The event is one thing. The verdict you attach to it is another. "My manager frowned" is an event. "I'm about to be fired" is a verdict, and the verdict is far closer to your own hands than the frown ever was.

Modern research on locus of control, the belief about whether outcomes depend on you or on outside forces, points the same way. Groth and colleagues (2019) pooled 15 studies, 3,986 people and 225 effect sizes. They found that unhelpful coping explained part of the link between an unhelpful locus of control and mental health problems. Both kinds of locus of control also had direct links to mental health problems that did not run through coping. The authors suggest that changing the unhelpful beliefs themselves may matter more than adding good coping habits. This is cross-sectional data, so it shows a link and not a cause.

Real life is rarely a clean split, though. Your health, your job and your relationships are partly up to you and partly not. So I treat the Stoic line as a thermostat dial, not a light switch. That is my practical take, not Stoic doctrine and not a finding.

Look at the thing keeping you up tonight. Is it the frown, or is it the story you wrote about the frown?

Acceptance is a skill that has been tested in trials

If worry is the wrong tool, what is the right one? The closest tested idea is acceptance, which means making room for a thought without arguing with it or obeying it.

A-Tjak and colleagues (2015) meta-analysed 39 randomised trials of acceptance and commitment therapy, with 1,821 patients. It beat control conditions overall (Hedges' g = 0.57). It also did not differ significantly from cognitive behavioural therapy. That therapy teaches acceptance alongside other skills, so it does not test Epictetus, and it is not Stoicism.

There is a catch. In the earlier review, acceptance and reappraisal had only small to medium links with symptoms, which the authors themselves called surprising given how central they are in therapy. So "just accept it" is not a magic key.

Think of a boat on a river. You can't stop the current, but you can stop rowing against it, and you can still steer. Acceptance is the second part of that sentence, not the first.

So the move is to stop rowing upstream and put your effort where the paddle can bite.

What to try

None of these steps is a trial-proven treatment. They are practical uses of the ideas above.

  1. Make two columns, five minutes, on paper. Head one "In my hands" and the other "Not in my hands." Put the worry in whichever column is honest. For a shouting colleague, their tone goes in the second column and your reply goes in the first.

  2. Add a third column for "I can influence." This is the dial. A test result isn't yours, but booking the appointment and asking the question you've been avoiding are. For each item here, write one action and a day.

  3. Separate the event from the verdict. Write the worry as a sentence, then ask whether it is something that happened or something you decided it means. "They didn't reply" is an event. "They've gone off me" is a verdict. Verdicts are the part you can question.

  4. Spot the picked ticket. If you've spent hours managing something that runs on luck, ask what you are actually changing. Often the answer is only how busy you feel.

  5. Expect the loop to come back. The worry will return, probably tonight. When it does, ask one question, "Is this mine?" If it is, do the smallest next step. If it isn't, let it sit there without feeding it. You will repeat this many times, and that is normal rather than failure.

How far to trust all this

Nobody I could find has run a controlled trial of the dichotomy of control as such. What exists are nearby ideas. Locus of control and rumination are links, not causes. The therapy trials test acceptance, not Stoicism.

The popular claims are weaker still. Modern Stoicism's own Stoic Week report (LeBon, 2018) shows a 12% rise in life satisfaction and a 14% drop in negative emotions. It is a before and after survey with no comparison group described, 3,702 people at the start and 852 valid questionnaires at the end, and it hasn't been peer reviewed as far as I could find. It is interesting, but it needs a proper trial before anyone leans on it. So the idea that learning the Stoic split will reduce your anxiety is plausible and, as far as I can tell, untested.

If worry is eating your days or your sleep, or you're having thoughts of harming yourself, please talk to a doctor, a mental health professional or a local crisis line. A philosophy article is not treatment.

The strongest version of all this fits in one question you can ask in the next ten minutes. What is my part in this? Do the smallest piece of it and let the rest go unattended. You are not someone who has to hold the whole river. You are the one with the paddle, and that is plenty.

In short

  • People who picked their own lottery ticket asked for more money to sell it than people handed one, though the odds were identical.
  • Worry feels like work, but rumination had the largest link with symptoms among the coping strategies reviewed in 114 studies.
  • The event is one thing and the verdict you attach to it is another. The verdict is the part you can question.
  • Acceptance-based therapy beat control conditions across 39 randomised trials (g = 0.57).
  • Ask "What is my part in this?", do the smallest piece, and let the rest go unattended.

Sources

This is education, not therapy. If you are struggling, talk to a qualified professional. More about this site.